The Old Lands OTS 3.0 Forum Index The Old Lands OTS 3.0
This is official board of our new project. Return to the old times, return the old langs. We change 7.6 client for 3.0 version. We change graphics, map and scripts. We need scripter C++ if you want to join our team, write in forum.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   GalleriesGalleries   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Doctors And Parents Agree To Settlement In Case In

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Old Lands OTS 3.0 Forum Index -> News Board
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dwo8C5z2




Joined: 10 Feb 2011
Posts: 1707
Read: 0 topics

Warns: 0/5
Location: England

PostPosted: Fri 12:43, 25 Mar 2011    Post subject: Doctors And Parents Agree To Settlement In Case In

Among the more frequent types of birth injuries is an Erb’s palsy injury which relates to the child’s shoulder and arm. This can be a significant injury that in the most severe circumstances leave the child with inadequate use of the arm even subsequent to surgery. In many instances the injury is avoidable. If this happens as a consequence of malpractice by a physician during the delivery procedure the parents might go after the physician with a medical malpractice claim for themselves and their child.
For instance, consider a reported case involving a woman expecting her third child. The expectant mother was either borderline for or actually had gestational diabetes, disproportionate weight gain during the pregnancy and had earlier delivered 2 large babies. Roughly four months into the pregnancy the expectant mother's physician documented that the unborn child was larger than expected by the gestational age and three months later the pregnant woman was borderline on her blood sugar test for gestational diabetes. An ultrasound after that visit revealed the baby’s weight within the 90th percentile. During the expectant mother's final prenatal consultation the day prior to the scheduled delivery the doctor documented the fundal height (a measurement of the uterus employed to assess fetal growth and development) at 43 centimeters. The expectant mother was forty weeks pregnant.
The following day the pregnant woman reported to the hospital as scheduled. After her admission, a second doctor took over her care. The hospital cchart documented the pregnant woman’s past borderline glucose test and also that she was at high risk given earlier “large gestational age” babies. This doctor did not, nevertheless, test her glucose level or try to determine the unborn child's weight before inducing her.
Almost four hours subsequent to her admission to the hospital the expectant mother's membranes spontaneously ruptured. When this happened a significant volume of meconium was witnessed. This is frequently a sign that the baby is in difficulty and frequently requires an emergency C-section. Around forty minutes subsequently the physician performed a vaginal examination. The doctor documented that the woman was 4 centimeters dilated. The doctor placed a fetal scalp electrode which highlighted early decelerations. Although it was not noted in the publication of the lawsuit, particular types of decelerations may be a sign of fetal distress. Just more than an hour afterwards the woman was fully dilated. The nurse’s paperwork mentioned the presence of shoulder dystocia, the delivery of the child's head, and the application of suprapubic pressure to help delivery.
The newborn weighed 10 pounds 10 ounces at birth. The baby had a head circumference in the ninetieth percentile. She was diagnosed with Erb’s palsy. When she grew her arm atrophied because of her incapacity to use it. She has developmental delays and has been diagnosed with cerebral palsy. The physicians failed to monitor the mother for gestational diabetes yet had ample knowledge that the baby was large before birth. Yet, they did not plan on a C-section and failed to attempt a common method prior to applying traction to the baby’s head. These steps could have avoided the baby’s injury. The parents went forward with a lawsuit against the doctors. The law firm that handled the case reported that the claim settled for $900,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych],000.Among the more frequent types of birth injuries is an Erb’s palsy injury which relates to the child’s shoulder and arm. This can be a significant injury that in the most severe circumstances leave the child with inadequate use of the arm even subsequent to surgery. In many instances the injury is avoidable. If this happens as a consequence of malpractice by a physician during the delivery procedure the parents might go after the physician with a medical malpractice claim for themselves and their child.
For instance, consider a reported case involving a woman expecting her third child. The expectant mother was either borderline for or actually had gestational diabetes, disproportionate weight gain during the pregnancy and had earlier delivered 2 large babies. Roughly four months into the pregnancy the expectant mother's physician documented that the unborn child was larger than expected by the gestational age and three months later the pregnant woman was borderline on her blood sugar test for gestational diabetes. An ultrasound after that visit revealed the baby’s weight within the 90th percentile. During the expectant mother's final prenatal consultation the day prior to the scheduled delivery the doctor documented the fundal height (a measurement of the uterus employed to assess fetal growth and development) at 43 centimeters. The expectant mother was forty weeks pregnant.
The following day the pregnant woman reported to the hospital as scheduled. After her admission, a second doctor took over her care. The hospital cchart documented the pregnant woman’s past borderline glucose test and also that she was at high risk given earlier “large gestational age” babies. This doctor did not, nevertheless, test her glucose level or try to determine the unborn child's weight before inducing her.
Almost four hours subsequent to her admission to the hospital the expectant mother's membranes spontaneously ruptured. When this happened a significant volume of meconium was witnessed. This is frequently a sign that the baby is in difficulty and frequently requires an emergency C-section. Around forty minutes subsequently the physician performed a vaginal examination. The doctor documented that the woman was 4 centimeters dilated. The doctor placed a fetal scalp electrode which highlighted early decelerations. Although it was not noted in the publication of the lawsuit, particular types of decelerations may be a sign of fetal distress. Just more than an hour afterwards the woman was fully dilated. The nurse’s paperwork mentioned the presence of shoulder dystocia, the delivery of the child's head, and the application of suprapubic pressure to help delivery.
The newborn weighed 10 pounds 10 ounces at birth. The baby had a head circumference in the ninetieth percentile. She was diagnosed with Erb’s palsy. When she grew her arm atrophied because of her incapacity to use it. She has developmental delays and has been diagnosed with cerebral palsy. The physicians failed to monitor the mother for gestational diabetes yet had ample knowledge that the baby was large before birth. Yet, they did not plan on a C-section and failed to attempt a common method prior to applying traction to the baby’s head. These steps could have avoided the baby’s injury. The parents went forward with a lawsuit against the doctors. The law firm that handled the case reported that the claim settled for $900,000.


The post has been approved 0 times
Back to top
View user's profile
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Old Lands OTS 3.0 Forum Index -> News Board All times are GMT + 2 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

fora.pl - załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin